A guy came to me a few years ago with a business that was throwing off $150,000 a year that didn’t exist anywhere. Not offshore, not hidden in some clever structure. Just cash.

Customers paid in cash, the seller pocketed it, and it never touched a bank statement or a tax return. He was adamant it was real.

Based on the type of business, I believed him. And I told the buyer we weren’t giving him a dime of credit for it.

That’s the part people don’t expect. I wasn’t skeptical that the money existed. I was certain it did, and I still said no. Sellers hear that and think the buyer is being difficult, or cheap, or doesn’t trust them personally, but none of that is what’s happening.

What’s happening is a lot simpler and a lot less forgiving: if it isn’t documented, it isn’t priced. Trust has nothing to do with it.

 

Why belief and price are different things

When you buy a business, you’re not buying the owner’s word. You’re buying a stream of earnings you can underwrite, finance, and eventually sell again yourself. 

A bank looking at that deal doesn’t care that the seller is an honest guy. A bank cares what the tax returns say. So does the next buyer, three or five years down the road, when this same business changes hands again.

Every dollar of value that only exists in someone’s memory or someone’s word is a dollar that dies the moment that person walks out the door. I’m not the last person who has to believe the story. I’m just the first one who has to stop pretending the story is the same thing as the numbers.

This is where sellers get the psychology backwards. They think the things they’re proudest of are the things that should command a premium. The under-the-table income that let them “keep more” for years. The reputation they built with customers who trust them personally. The specialized skill that only they have. In their mind, all of that is upside.

 

 

However, to a buyer, a lot of it is exposure. Pride and provability are not the same currency, and a seller who’s spent a decade optimizing for one is often shocked to learn the market only pays for the other.

 

The radiologist problem

Take the extreme version of this, because it makes the logic impossible to miss. Say a radiologist owns a single practice. He’s the radiologist. He reads every chart, makes every call, and the entire value of that business lives inside his training and his judgment.

I know almost nothing about radiology. I had a neighbor once who did it for a living, and that’s the extent of my expertise. But I don’t need to understand radiology to understand that business, because the moment he leaves, so does everything the business was worth.

I wouldn’t buy it. Nobody watching this would buy it.

The only rational buyer is another radiologist, and even they should discount it hard, because they’re not buying a business, they’re buying a job with extra paperwork.

 

When talent isn’t an asset

Most sellers aren’t running anything that stark. But a milder version of the same problem shows up constantly, and it usually wears a nicer costume: talent.

I had a guy at a talk last week ask me, essentially, what about the people? He’d spent real money and real years building a team of the best people he could find, creating a culture entrepreneurial enough that good people wanted to stay.

Great strategy. Genuinely one of the better ways to build a company that outlasts you. However, he wanted that investment recognized as its own asset, separate from what it produced.

And I told him what I’ll tell anyone: I don’t care if it’s your talent, your fleet of trucks, or the one machine in the building that does something nobody else can replicate. None of that gets priced on its own.

 

 

If hiring great people made the company grow and made earnings grow with it, that shows up in the numbers already. The team isn’t a bonus feature sitting next to the earnings. It’s either baked into them, or it walks out the door with the seller and it was never really the business’s asset to begin with.

 

The only test that matters

That’s the test I run on everything, and it’s a duller test than most sellers expect. Not “is this valuable,” because almost everything a seller points to is valuable to somebody, but: does this survive the transaction without the seller standing next to it? 

Documentation survives, because a tax return doesn’t need anyone’s memory to be true.

A diversified customer base survives, because no single relationship has to be re-earned by a new owner.

A trained team with real processes around them survives, because the org chart doesn’t collapse when one person leaves the building.

A radiologist’s hands do not survive. A verbal claim about cash does not survive. A founder’s personal reputation with his oldest customers, more often than sellers want to admit, does not survive either.

 

 

Once you start running that test, you stop seeing “risk” as some abstract line item on a diligence checklist and start seeing it as a very specific question you can ask about anything in front of you: what happens to this exact piece of value the day the seller stops showing up. Most of what makes a business feel impressive to its owner fails that question quietly. The parts that pass it are usually the least glamorous parts of the operation, and they’re the only parts anyone is actually buying.

If you’re getting ready to sell, or you’re the one sitting across the table trying to figure out what’s real, that question is worth running on every asset your business claims to have, well before anyone else asks it for you.

Ready to acquire a business in the next 12 months? The Acquisition Lab is your first stop. Reach out today and get on the fast track to becoming an acquisition entrepreneur.